fbpx

Dell XPS 17 evaluate: The massive display returns in a slim, trendy shell


The brand new Dell XPS 17 makes an enormous first impression, and that is not solely as a result of it is the primary 17-inch XPS laptop computer in virtually a decade. In comparison with the final XPS 17 we reviewed way back, and even most trendy 17-inch laptops, it is (comparatively) small, with a slim, top-of-the-line design and a tiny-bezeled 4K-plus calibrated show.

LikeBig, vibrant show with well-implemented colour administration supportFast for its componentsSleek designComfortable keyboard

Do not LikeWould love some increased finish graphics choices and a greater webcam

It is one of many smallest 17-inch laptops for artistic use I’ve seen — barely bigger than its center sibling, the XPS 15 9500 and solely a bit extra substantial than a MacBook Professional 16. And in some ways, it is one in all my favourite huge boys to this point. Fairly, however highly effective sufficient for basic use that I am not yelling at it on a regular basis, small enough and light-weight sufficient to make it lap pleasant and with a good steadiness between pace and battery life and no sacrifices on the keyboard.

Lori Grunin/CNET

The design is basically the identical because the XPS 15, and even makes use of the identical keyboard, however pads the edges with greater audio system and provides an additional USB-C port; it additionally has beefed up cooling over the 15-inch mannequin to accommodate the higher-powered GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q graphics processor. And whereas the XPS 15 is nice for picture modifying, the 17-inch is even higher if you do not have exterior displays, because of the bigger 17.2-inch display. 

As a lot as I prefer it, although, my preliminary impression holds: I might gladly sacrifice just a little thinness for extra energy. To shave off the few millimeters that make it smaller than the Razer Blade Professional 17, the Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR and different fashions with i7-10875H processors (or the equal) and the 4K-ish, 100% Adobe RGB show, the XPS 17 sacrifices on the GPU entrance and maxes out with an RTX 2060 Max-Q. It could have been extra compelling with even an RTX 2070 Tremendous Max-Q. There might be a mannequin developing with the doubtless quicker Core i9-10885H, although.

And being skinny means shedding the comfort of any ports, save USB-C. The XPS 17 does have 4 of these, two of that are Thunderbolt 3, and Dell ships it with a dongle that provides a USB-A and HDMI connection, however I actually miss having extra USB-A ports; even with the dongle and a CalDigit TS3 Plus hub, I’ve nonetheless acquired to do some connection juggling to deal with all my gadgets. And one of many ports is for energy, so that you’re down to 3 proper out of the gate. Nonetheless, 4 is healthier than the three on the XPS 15.

The Dell XPS 15 9500 and XPS 17 9700

Lastly, when a producer begins heralding all of the work it put in to squeeze a webcam right into a tiny bezel or how a lot work it took to overtake the cooling system to help the parts within the thinner design, my mind at all times goes to “you imply, I might need had a greater webcam and higher-end graphics in the event you’d simply left it just a little thicker?” A system like this deserves higher than the middling 720p webcam and barely RTX graphics.

Clearly for creators

Our “Creator Version” take a look at configuration does ship a pleasant steadiness of dimension, energy and worth for fundamental 3D work, gaming or video modifying; the RTX 2060 Max-Q holds it again in some circumstances, particularly for working in 4K or in skilled graphics functions. For picture modifying, although, it can save you just a few hundred bucks by dropping right down to the GTX 1650 Ti. 

I actually do not suggest the $1,400 entry configuration with 8GB reminiscence and no discrete graphics. If you might want to go for a system so underpowered for budgetary causes, then take into account going even additional right down to one thing with a lesser show and fewer glamorous look, such because the sub-$1,000 Inspiron 17 3000. It isn’t that the entry-level config is a foul worth — it is truly a reasonably good worth given the parts — however paying that a lot for under 8GB and built-in graphics simply feels… flawed. However it might provide you with one thing fairly to have a look at because it limps alongside.

Our precise configuration is not out there in different areas, particularly within the UK and Australia. You may get it with 16GB reminiscence within the UK for £2,899 or with a 2TB SSD and GTX 1650 Ti for £3,099. In Australia, there are not any RTX choices and as an alternative Dell badges something with an i7 as a Creator Version; there, the choices max out with an i7-10750H, GTX 1650 Ti, 1 TB SSD and 32GB reminiscence for AU$5,499. 

The dimensions of the XPS 17 9700 (backside) relative to the XPS 15 9500 (high).

Lori Grunin/CNET
Dell XPS 17 9700

Worth as reviewed

$2,999

Show dimension/decision

17.3-inch 3, 3,840 x 2,400

PC CPU

Intel Core i7-10875H

PC Reminiscence

32GB 3,233MHz DDR4

Graphics

6GB Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q

Storage

1TB SSD, SD card slot

Ports

Four x USB-C (2 x Thunderbolt 3, 1 x PD), 1 x audio

Networking

Killer AX1650s WiFi 6 (802.11ax), Bluetooth 5.0

Working system

Microsoft Home windows Dwelling (2004)

Weight

5.5 lbs. (2.5 kg)

Coloration coding 

The 16:10 3,840×2,400 show is not fairly as correct because the one on the XPS 15 9500 out of the field — it is just a little bluer and fewer correct — nevertheless it covers 100% of Adobe RGB and 94% P3, is sufficiently correct for basic colour work (Delta E lower than 3) and continues to be higher total than lots of the IPS touchscreen shows. Plus, it is brighter than the 15 at about 530 nits with increased distinction (about 1700:1), and meets DisplayHDR 400 requirements, for no matter that is value. (We take a look at screens utilizing Portrait Shows’ Calman 5 Final and an X-Ceremony i1Display Professional Plus.) 

It additionally helps Dell’s PremierColor colour administration, which suggests you’ll be able to tweak it to a greater stage of accuracy. As with the XPS 15, Dell’s manufacturing unit calibrated profiles truly clip the gamut boundaries to the colour area; in different phrases, though the show can produce colours effectively exterior sRGB, it will not in the event you’ve opted to make use of the sRGB colour profile. That is actually useful if you might want to verify out-of-gamut colours. You possibly can create customized profiles with a calibrator utilizing PremierColor as effectively, however solely with the favored X-Ceremony i1Display Professional; it would not even help the Plus but, so I could not take a look at it. (If you wish to calibrate it utilizing your personal software program and a distinct calibrator, keep in mind to show PremierColor off.)

This can be a actually, actually huge touchpad, although nonetheless a tiny bit smaller than the MacBook Professional 16’s.

Lori Grunin/CNET

As an Nvidia Max-Q Optimus-supporting system, which makes use of the discrete graphics for processing however would not have any shows related to it, if you wish to power it to make use of the graphics processor on a regular basis you have to flip a change within the BIOS. Although it is regular to need to reboot to alter it in older-generation Optimus methods — newer Superior Optimus would not require it — Dell goes the additional mile to cover it within the BIOS. Most different corporations have a software program or bodily change. 

Although efficiency is not at all times higher utilizing the discrete GPU, it might probably make a big distinction in gaming or skilled graphics functions. And, as an illustration, you’ll be able to’t run a monitor at greater than 144Hz refresh, just like the 165Hz HP Omen 27i I am testing, until you are in discrete GPU mode.

Is it value giving up all that energy and connectors for eight ounces (227g) and 0.4mm? (Dell XPS 17 9700 high, Razer Blade Professional 17 backside)

Lori Grunin/CNET

In fact, that eats up the battery, which is why many producers default to Optimus, like Dell. That earns it affordable, however not stellar, marks on battery life: It lasted just a little over 9 hours on our battery assessments. In my on a regular basis use (principally simply writing and heavy Google Apps), it was nearer to 4 hours. However that is not too unhealthy for me.

The Razer Blade Professional 17 (evaluate nonetheless in progress) goes the opposite means, transport with the extra power-hungry discrete GPU mode enabled. That can lead to some deceptive efficiency comparisons; in Optimus mode, extra energy is allotted to the CPU, which suggests it is quicker on CPU-intensive actions, similar to producing thumbnails. So the efficiency hole between the Dell and the Razer, which use the identical processor, will get narrower in the event you evaluate them that means moderately than on the default settings as we do. 

Nonetheless, the Dell usually outperforms it by fairly a bit on processor pace. However the XPS 15 nonetheless races previous its huge sister with the identical CPU — not essentially sufficient to outweigh the advantages of the XPS 17’s greater display for duties like picture modifying, however one thing to think about. The true enchantment could also be to these of us sufficiently old to be nostalgic for the long-gone, however not forgotten, 17-inch MacBook Professional. 

Geekbench 5 (multicore)

Microsoft Floor Guide 3 (15-inch)

Razer Blade Professional 17 (early 2020)

Be aware:
Longer bars point out higher efficiency

Geekbench 5 (single-core)

Razer Blade Professional 17 (early 2020)

Be aware:
Longer bars point out higher efficiency

Geekbench 5 (Vulkan)

Microsoft Floor Guide 3 (15-inch)

Razer Blade Professional 17 (early 2020)

Be aware:
Longer bars point out higher efficiency

Cinebench R20 CPU (multicore)

Microsoft Floor Guide 3 (15-inch)

Razer Blade Professional 17 (early 2020)

Be aware:
Longer bars point out higher efficiency

3DMark Hearth Strike Extremely

Microsoft Floor Guide 3 (15-inch)

Razer Blade Professional 17 (early 2020)

Be aware:
Longer bars point out higher efficiency

Shadow of the Tomb Raider gaming take a look at

Microsoft Floor Guide 3 (15-inch)

Razer Blade Professional 17 (early 2020)

Be aware:
Longer bars point out higher efficiency (FPS)

3DMark Port Royal (RTX)

Razer Blade Professional 17 (early 2020)

Be aware:
Longer bars point out higher efficiency

Video playback battery drain take a look at (streaming)

Be aware:
Longer bars point out higher efficiency (in minutes)

System configurations

Apple MacBook Professional (16-inch)

Apple MacOS Catalina 10.15.1; 2.4GHz Intel Core i9-9980HK; 32GB DDR3 SDRAM 2,666MHz; 8GB Radeon Professional 5500M/1,536MB Intel HD Graphics 630; 2TB SSD

Dell XPS 15 9500

Microsoft Home windows 10 Dwelling (1909); 2.3GHz Intel Core i7-10875H; 16GB DDR4 SDRAM 2,933MHz; 4GB Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Ti; 512GB SSD

Dell XPS 17 9700

Microsoft Home windows 10 Dwelling (2004); 2.3GHz Intel Core i7-10875H; 32GB DDR4 SDRAM 3,233MHz; 6GB Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q; 1TB SSD

Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED

Microsoft Home windows 10 Professional (64-bit); 2.6GHz Intel Core i7-9750H; 16GB DDR4 SDRAM 2,666MHz; 8GB Nvidia GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design; 512GB SSD

Microsoft Floor Guide 3 (15-inch)

Microsoft Home windows 10 Dwelling (1909); 1.3GHz Intel Core i7-1065G7; 32GB DDR4 SDRAM 4,267MHz; Intel Iris Plus Graphics and 6GB Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti with Max-Q design; 512GB SSD

Razer Blade Professional 17 (early 2020)

Microsoft Home windows 10 Dwelling (1909); 2.3GHz Intel Core i7-10875H; 16GB DDR4 SDRAM 3,233MHz; 8GB Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080 Tremendous Max-Q; 1TB SSD

About the author: SubSellKaro

Related Posts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

%d bloggers like this: