Nokia 1.Three Assessment: Too Low cost?

Want an inexpensive cellphone, like a very low-cost one? Properly the Nokia 1.Three appears prefer it is perhaps the very best smartphone underneath £100 with its higher than anticipated display and battery life inside a compact design.

Nevertheless, frustratingly poor efficiency implies that these issues don’t matter an excessive amount of and also you’ll be higher off elsewhere.


There’s little to say concerning the Nokia 1.Three design as a result of this is without doubt one of the most plain handsets round. Properly within the Charcoal mannequin I examined anyway – the Cyan and Sand are much more fascinating.

It appears a little bit dated and gained’t be turning any heads down the pub, however that’s hardly shocking given a budget value of the cellphone.

On the entrance you could have a small Nokia brand on the backside, pretty chunky bezels across the display and a small notch to accommodate the entrance going through digital camera. That’s about the one indication that this isn’t a cellphone from a number of years in the past.

That and the extra delicate inclusion of a 3rd button, which is devoted to summoning the Google Assistant.

In all probability essentially the most fascinating factor concerning the design is that the plastic rear cowl comes off, which is extraordinarily uncommon as of late. As a substitute of inserting a SIM or reminiscence card by way of a tray, you’ll must take the again off as an alternative.

The problem is firstly that this isn’t apparent as there is no notch or just like get some buy. Some paperwork within the field merely says to take away it beginning at one nook however I discovered it practically not possible and virtually broke a fingernail making an attempt to unclip the duvet.

If not some form of notch within the plastic, a instrument must be included within the field. When you do get it off, you’ll be able to entry the cardboard slots in addition to the battery, which is detachable – useful if you happen to like to hold a spare.

If there are some good issues to say, it’s that the Nokia 1.Three is a compact handset which is difficult to search out as of late. It’s concerning the footprint of the Google Pixel 3, though thicker and a little bit heavier.


A 5.71in display is the principle motive for the Nokia 1.Three being one of many smaller smartphones available on the market and I’m happy that it’s nonetheless nearly an choice for these not wanting one thing over 6in, which is now the norm.

The show is the very best {hardware} component concerning the cellphone with the form of credentials you won’t anticipate at this value. It’s an IPS panel so has good viewing angles and the HD+ decision over this dimension leads to a pixel density of virtually 300ppi – the identical you’d get on an Amazon Kindle in order that’s not unhealthy in any respect.

The Nokia 1.3’s display has delicate colors and distinction isn’t too unhealthy both. Extra importantly, it has an honest quantity of brightness whenever you want it.

This would possibly nicely be your first cellphone with a notch – the way in which the display curves across the entrance digital camera – and also you is perhaps apprehensive about it however you’ll get used to it faster than you may think.


It’s all nicely and good having a pleasant show, however with out the efficiency to match you spend more often than not ready for stated show to load one thing.

HMD (the agency behind the Nokia model as of late) would have been higher off spending on different areas and placing a lower-grade display in.

The Nokia 1.Three comes with a Qualcomm 215 processor for, and I quote, “the velocity you want”.

This low-grade chip mixed with simply 1GB of RAM is something however the velocity wanted for clean operation, regardless of the cellphone working the ‘Go version’ of Android 10 – which I’ll speak about later.

I haven’t been in a position to get any benchmark apps to run to the purpose of returning a rating and that claims lots concerning the efficiency already.

Even if you happen to don’t care about benchmark scores, the real-world efficiency of the Nokia 1.Three is the worst I’ve seen in fairly a while.

Whereas the cellphone has moments of feeling virtually clean, it’s brief lived and I misplaced rely of the occasions when issues would take north of 5 and even 10 seconds to be accomplished. And I’m not speaking about loading some intensive recreation, generally simply ready for the keyboard to pop-up so I may sort one thing.

A handful of occasions the cellphone fully froze telling me “the System UI isn’t responding”. This sort of sluggish efficiency simply results in frustration – second clicks whenever you assume the primary was by no means registered and many others – and in the end an absence of belief within the machine.

It is a very low-cost cellphone so efficiency is sure to be slower than dearer rivals and if it was simply an occasional wait then I may settle for it, however sadly it’s too frequent and due to this fact an enormous motive to not purchase the Nokia 1.3.

Android Go

The above efficiency points are regardless of the Nokia 1.Three working Android 10 (Go version), which in a nutshell is a fundamental model of the working system tailor-made to run on cheaper units because of the extra fundamental specs.

It’s type of the naked minimal in some ways as you’ll see ‘Go’ variations of most apps pre-installed on the cellphone. A few of these, like Maps Go, aren’t even apps and easily run in Chrome.

You do get a few of the options of full Android 10 like darkish mode however there’s lots lacking too like navigation gestures and widgets so you’ll be able to’t even put a clock on the house display.

Whereas these Google apps run higher than the complete variations, there aren’t many ‘lite’ editions of huge title apps on the market aside from Fb and Twitter.

Even with the Go or Lite variations, the efficiency simply isn’t fluid sufficient.

In case you do determine to bear with the efficiency points, then you’re going to get updates to Android 11 (Go version) and past.

Battery Life

I discovered battery life on the Nokia 1.Three to be superb. There’s a 3000mAh battery which in my testing can final greater than a day – though that is partly right down to giving up on it for numerous duties because of the efficiency and resorting to a laptop computer as an alternative.

Being this low-cost, it’s no shock that there’s an older Micro-USB port and no quick charging on provide.

The plus level right here is that the battery is detachable if you wish to carry a spare.


The images abilities of the Nokia 1.Three look like a little bit of a moot level at this stage of the assessment however there’s a single 8Mp digital camera on the rear with an LED flash and a 5Mp entrance going through digital camera for selfies – each of that are able to taking pictures fundamental 720p video.

Whereas the Nokia 1.Three is able to taking some photographs worthy of posting on social media, these are a little bit too few and much between. Typically talking, high quality is low which is to be anticipated for a cellphone this low-cost.

Nevertheless, it’s typically a little bit of a mission simply to get even that with how slowly every thing runs. It’s simple to overlook a second because of the delay between urgent the shutter button and the photograph truly being taken.

So until you’re taking panorama photographs and have loads of endurance then this isn’t the digital camera for you.

Nokia touts ‘highly effective AI low-light imaging’ however the low gentle pattern I took speaks for itself actually. There’s additionally a portrait mode however this solely works on faces and I struggled to get it to work.

The selfie digital camera isn’t too unhealthy and may end up in often good photographs, once more if you happen to could be bothered to bear with how lengthy it takes to get one.

Worth & Options

Coming in at simply £79 (US$99), the Nokia 1.Three is without doubt one of the most inexpensive smartphones you should buy. Our higher cap for a price range cellphone is £250 so you possibly can name this uber-budget.

You should buy it from Amazon, Argos, Currys and Very.

There’s only a few smartphones that are available in at underneath £100. Nevertheless, Motorola’s Moto E6s is a better rival at £99. Within the US, you will get the common Moto E6 at a lowered value of $99.

Additionally, you will wish to think about the Xiaomi Redmi 7A which can also be accessible for £99.

In case you’re price range is not tremendous tight then you possibly can think about units just like the £169 Motorola One Macro or the agency’s personal Nokia 5.3, which is £149.


In case you’re on the lookout for an especially low-cost smartphone then the Nokia 1.Three will appear like a lovely deal.

Though it is received a display a lot better than you would possibly anticipate at this value, stable battery life and a compact design many will discover a boon in comparison with so many enormous handsets, there’s a difficulty we won’t actually look previous.

These good factors are all fairly pointless when the efficiency is as sluggish because the Nokia 1.Three is ready to provide.

Occasional lag could be acceptable at this value, however it’s simply too frequent and exaggerated – even when utilizing Go and Lite apps – to suggest this cellphone when there are higher options for not rather more cash. 

Nokia 1.3: Specs

Working system: Android 10 (Go version)

Show: 5.71in, HD+ 720×1520, 19:9 IPS LCD display

Processor: Qualcomm 215

Reminiscence: 1GB RAM

Storage: 16GB w/ microSD help

Cameras: 8Mp predominant, 5Mp entrance

Connectivity: Wi-Fi, Bluetooth 4.2, micro-USB

Audio: 3.5mm headphone jack, rear mono speaker, FM radio

Battery: 3000mAh (detachable), 5W charging

Dimensions: 147.Three x 71.2 x 9.35mm

Weight: 155g

Colors: Charcoal, Cyan, Sand


Notice: We could earn a fee whenever you purchase via hyperlinks on our web site, at no further value to you. This does not have an effect on our editorial independence. Study extra.

About the author: SubSellKaro

Related Posts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

%d bloggers like this: