At £159, it’s in all probability no shock to listen to that the Oppo A53 isn’t an thrilling cellphone. Nevertheless it doesn’t should be. What it’s as a substitute is an impressively competent cellphone – one which received’t wow you, however will ship every little thing you want it to, regardless of the discount basement value.
The one actual problem for the A53 is that it’s up towards stiff competitors, and spending even an additional £20 or £30 will ship a stable efficiency enhance from rivals – but when you might want to make each penny depend, this does the job properly.
Design and construct
First up, the A53 is among the trendy wave of funds telephones that basically don’t look the half – by which I imply you would simply mistake this for a tool value a couple of instances the RRP.
Out there in black or a mint inexperienced, the A53 has a shiny plastic rear that’s designed to appear to be glass. It nearly pulls off the trick, although the worth you pay for that’s that it’s an actual fingerprint magnet, and the delicate plastic has already picked up fairly a couple of micro-abrasions and scratches over a couple of weeks with the cellphone.
The 6.5in show is giant however not gargantuan, and bordered by comparatively slim bezels – although there’s a little bit of an even bigger chin on the backside. A punch-hole selfie digital camera completes the quasi-flagship aesthetic within the top-left nook.
This show is among the A53’s strengths, because it encompasses a excessive 90Hz refresh price – nonetheless uncommon in low cost telephones, although getting extra widespread. It’s not OLED after all, however the larger tradeoff is decision: it’s solely 720p. How a lot that issues on a display screen this dimension remains to be up for debate although, and I believe many customers will admire the smoothness of the refresh price greater than they’d Full HD anyway.
The primary design factor that offers away the cellphone’s actual value level is arguably simply that at 8.4mm thick it feels a contact chunky, although Oppo has executed its finest to curve the sides to maintain the cellphone comfy to carry. At 186g it’s not too heavy both, although you wouldn’t name it light-weight.
There’s no waterproofing to talk of, however the upside of that’s that you simply do nonetheless get an actual headphone jack – more and more uncommon even in funds gadgets, however nonetheless important for anybody who hasn’t but made the improve to wi-fi headphones.
Specs and efficiency
Contained in the cellphone, the worth level turns into a bit extra apparent. On the coronary heart is the Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 chipset, which within the UK comes paired with 4GB of RAM and a measly 64GB storage – although different SKUs can be found elsewhere.
Efficiency is okay. The cellphone runs properly sufficient, and it’s by no means crashed or frozen within the time I have been utilizing it. Switching between apps could be sluggish, and with solely 4GB RAM it will possibly solely maintain one or two apps in reminiscence at a time, slowing issues down additional.
I in all probability wouldn’t strive utilizing it for taking part in any video games extra superior than Sweet Crush both – as you’ll be able to see within the benchmark outcomes, it struggles to ship body charges above 30fps even in essentially the most fundamental graphics benchmarks.
I fear that because the cellphone is a bit sluggish now, it’d turn into downright glacial in a 12 months or two’s time, however longevity is all the time difficult to foretell, and the A53 could properly maintain its personal.
It ought to at the least be a protected guess for battery life. The 5000mAh cell right here is undeniably beneficiant, making it the most effective battery life telephones we’ve examined to this point this 12 months. I’ve been utilizing the cellphone for 3 weeks or so, and have ditched my traditional in a single day charging behavior – there’s simply no want. I are inclined to prime the A53 up as soon as each few days, and don’t fear in regards to the battery till it drops under 20%.
On the subject of charging, the 18W USB-C wired charging is among the many quickest you’ll be able to count on round this value, topping the cellphone up by about 34% in half an hour. You shouldn’t be shocked that there’s no wi-fi charging choice although.
The digital camera is stable, however easy. Though there are three lenses on the rear, you solely actually have one to play with: a 13Mp, f/2.2 essential lens. The opposite two are 2Mp macro and depth sensors – helpful for bettering your close-range and portrait photographs, however not usable on their very own.
In first rate lighting the digital camera holds its personal, with engaging, punchy colors and sufficient element to cross muster – although the autofocus often runs a bit delicate, leaving some photographs a bit fuzzy. There’s HDR assist and a portrait mode too, although these are fairly par for the course nowadays.
As the sunshine drops so does high quality, with noticeable noise and degradation in low mild photographs, and no devoted evening mode to assist out right here. Even barely dim lighting is sufficient for efficiency to endure – it doesn’t should be pitch black – however in case you can reside with that then this may do you properly.
Funnily sufficient, the selfie digital camera is definitely arguably the perfect of the bunch. It’s a 16Mp, f/2.Zero lens, which means it gives extra element and higher mild administration than the rear cameras. There’s little or no to complain about on this aspect.
Lastly, by way of connectivity you get Wi-Fi and Bluetooth 5.0, however no NFC – which means you’ll be able to’t use the cellphone for contactless funds. You need to use the rear fingerprint sensor to unlock the machine, or a much less safe face unlock choice.
The A53 runs Android 10 utilizing Oppo’s personal ColorOS 7.2 pores and skin. Visually talking this is among the busier Android variations about – Oppo’s design language could be very a lot its personal – however by way of performance there’s nothing too out of the atypical.
Consumers ought to count on to get an replace to Android 11 in some unspecified time in the future in 2021, however model updates to Android 12 and past are much less probably.
Value and availability
The Oppo A53 launched at £159, however on the time of writing is extensively obtainable for £149, making it fairly straightforward on the pockets. You should buy it direct from Oppo, or from the likes of Amazon, Currys, or John Lewis. That is nearly as low cost as we’d ever suggest you go on a cellphone – under this value you normally begin to actually really feel the knock in efficiency.
If you happen to can afford it, we’d suggest you pay a bit extra for the £179 Realme 7, and even the Realme 6, which is now at £159 and delivers a greater digital camera and quicker charging than the A53. At £199 the Xiaomi Poco X3 enters the image, with a severe leap in efficiency.
That additional expenditure might not be an choice for everyone after all, and if £149 is your restrict then the A53 is a reliable sufficient choice. For extra choices, take a look at our full rating of the perfect funds telephones we have reviewed, our choose of the perfect UK funds cellphone offers proper now, or our rating of the perfect Oppo telephones at any value vary.
There are higher low cost telephones on the market, but when the Oppo A53 sits on the prime of your funds then you would additionally do a lot worse.
Perks just like the 90Hz show and excellent battery life make up for barely sluggish efficiency and an unexciting digital camera, and the premium-feeling design doesn’t damage both.
However in case you can spend extra, it’s best to.
Oppo A53: Specs
Android 10 with ColorOs 7.2
6.5in HD (720×1600) LCD, 90Hz
Qualcomm Snapdragon 460
64GB inside storage
microSD card slot
13Mp essential, f/2.2, PDAF
16Mp, f/2.Zero selfie digital camera
11ac dual-band Wi-Fi
3.5mm headphone jack
5000mAh non-removable battery
Quick charging 18W
163.9 x 75.1 x 8.4mm
Word: We could earn a fee while you purchase by way of hyperlinks on our website, at no additional price to you. This does not have an effect on our editorial independence. Study extra.